Ayurvedic medicine has a rich history in India. Known as the’medicine of the kings’, it was first introduced to the world by Dr. Deepak Chopra. A former physician to the president of India, Dr. Balendu Prakash established Paadav, a specialty Ayurvedic hospital in India that practices traditional methods of treatment. In 1999, he was awarded the Padma Shri, the fourth highest civilian honor in India.
The All India Institute of Ayurveda is a medical facility affiliated to the Ministry of Ayush. It features an OPD and IPD department. The hospital is licensed to perform surgeries. It offers a variety of treatments, including Panchakarma therapy. It has 200 beds and a covid care unit. The hospital is located near Mathura Road in the national capital. Public transport is available.
The Ayur Bethaniya Ayurveda Hospital in Kerala is one of the best places to go for ayurvedic treatments. The hospital has been providing quality ayurvedic care for many years. Treatments include Panchakarma, special therapies, and a personalized diet plan. The hospital also has a team of highly qualified doctors and paramedical staff that is ready to assist with your treatment.
The best Ayurvedic hospital in Kerala is Kairali Ayurvedic Health Resort. This hospital has twenty-five centres in India and twenty abroad. The doctors at Kairali Ayurvedic Health Resort are experts in ayurvedic treatment, and their impressive panel of physicians is among the best in the world. Kairali offers retreat camps where patients can learn about Ayurvedic medicine and receive world-class treatment.
Doing a PG in Ayurvedic medicine is not useful for primary level clinical emergencies. Practitioners do not prescribe allopathic drugs. Hence, they do not prepare for primary-level emergencies. Besides, the course curriculum of a PG in Ayurveda is far less useful than the curriculum of a BAMS.
PG in Ayurveda is not trained to handle primary-level clinical emergencies
A study by the Indian Journal of Pharmacology revealed that doctors enrolled in a PG in Ayurveda were more likely to prescribe allopathic medicines than their allopathic counterparts. The researchers found that Ayurveda practitioners also prescribed more acidity-lowering drugs and antibiotics than their allopathic colleagues. Such practices are inefficient and could contribute to the rise in antibiotic resistance. Further, these irrational practices are likely to increase the cost of healthcare in the country.
Ayurvedic graduates are not adequately trained to manage acute medical emergencies. They do not receive hands-on training in procedures like suturing, catheterization, and normal delivery. Even basic surgical procedures such as laparoscopy are not taught to them in Ayurveda. This lack of exposure limits their ability to deal with primary-level clinical emergencies.
Practitioners do not prescribe allopathic drugs
Ayurveda doctors can prescribe serious medications as well as vitamins and supplements. Unlike allopathic doctors, they are fully qualified and trained in a variety of branches of medicine. In some cases, they can also prescribe allopathic drugs. The government should promote ayurveda doctors and make their education more accessible. This will be beneficial to both the patient and the practitioner.
AYUSH practitioners may choose to remain in rural areas to enhance their portfolio rather than relocating to urban areas. The shortage of doctors in government health centers is a persistent problem in India. In many rural areas, there is a shortage of specialists. In government community health centres, there is a severe shortage of specialists. Ayurveda practitioners may choose to practice in a rural community, which is where the majority of AYUSH practitioners practice.
The IMA, which represents the Indian medical profession, is not pleased with this ruling. It is unclear why the state would allow Ayurveda practitioners to prescribe allopathic drugs. Several physicians, however, are against the move. The state government and a senior physician in Uttarakhand cited two recent cases in which ayurveda practitioners did not prescribe allopathic drugs. However, the Uttarakhand unit of the IMA sent a defamation notice to Ramdev and demanded Rs 1,000 crore in damages.
The state government of Uttarakhand, which has one of the highest percentages of rural residents in the country, has approved the practice of ayurveda doctors prescribing allopathic drugs. However, the Indian Medical Council, which represents the interests of allopathic practitioners, reacted sharply to this decision. However, the decision will not help rural patients, and will ultimately delay the development of AYUSH in the state.
There is no scientific proof that homeopathic medicines are more effective than conventional medicines. Homeopathic medicines are not regulated and are not tested as mainstream drugs are. As a result, every person’s symptoms may respond differently to a homeopathic treatment. This is an important distinction to make because different approaches to treatment work for different people. There are some advantages of both. While both systems of medicine are effective, there is no universal cure.
Westerners consult a healthcare provider when they are sick. They visit a practitioner to get a diagnosis. The pathogens causing the illness are then identified and the treatment is geared toward fighting the pathogens. As a result, the same medicines are often prescribed to multiple patients. In contrast, Ayurveda diagnoses on a disease-level rather than on the patient. This requires an exhaustive examination.
Despite the popularity of the Ayurveda system, it is worth noting that only 20% of graduates from Ayurveda colleges actually practice their own systems. The remaining 80% end up practicing Allopathy. To understand more about how this happened, take a look at Box-2. It is a historical background of AYUSH in India and recounts how ayurveda received political support.
PGs do not prepare for primary-level clinical emergencies
Despite the importance of primary care in the Ayurvedic medical field, many PGs fail to prepare for the most basic clinical emergencies. Fortunately, Ayurveda is a highly diverse science with an expanding body of literature. To learn more about its nuances, read this review. Listed below are some of its most common primary-level clinical emergencies.
One of the most ancient healthcare systems in the Indian Subcontinent, Ayurveda has a history spanning over three millennia. Its literature is written in both Sanskrit and regional languages, and its knowledge base is dynamic. In the late nineteenth century, Ayurveda was formalized in education, clinical approaches, and product manufacturing. After independence, the science of Ayurveda became the official healthcare system of India.